Custody
Without equal physical care as the default, a father enters court as a petitioner. He must prove his right to what was his daily life before divorce.
Russia’s Family Code declares parental equality, yet a divorce dispute is built around selecting one residence for the child. There is no automatic model of equal residence with both parents. One parent gets daily life with the child. The other gets a contact schedule and a financial duty.
Without equal physical care as the default, a father enters court as a petitioner. He must prove his right to what was his daily life before divorce.
Children must be supported. A transfer must not replace parenting, and the duty to pay must not justify restricting contact.
After conception, a man can neither insist on birth nor reject the future financial duty. The woman owns the decision while both are bound by its consequences.
Division of marital property was designed to protect an economically dependent wife. Today it can award property regardless of who created it and at what cost.
When one parent blocks the other, time works against the excluded parent. A later judgment cannot restore the lost years.
For a man, divorce can mean losing home, children, property, status, and social network at once. Society reduces that loss to a financial dispute.
Make full participation by both safe parents the default. Demand specific reasons for any restriction. Enforce contact orders as consistently as support orders.
A child needs a father in daily life, not a payer outside it.